If Biden was worth a shit he wouldn't be "trying to walk a line" - his answer to dudes in skirts would be an emphatic and unambiguous "No".
I happen to mostly agree with you, but I know all Americans don’t feel that way and it’s ok to find compromise.
Of course if he was worth a shit he wouldn't take showers with his daughter, wouldn't get his own son off the hook after a drug arrest while bellowing that "drug users must be held accountable" among a long litany of other things including being happy to be the pretend Puppet In Chief..
We don’t know the details or the realities behind a child’s journal entry that says “probably inappropriate”. She didn’t say she was molested, unlike dozens of women that say Trump did molest them.
Plugging your ears and refusing to see the evidence of the sketchiness of the 2020 election says otherwise.
I know it all would be uncovered if you were the attorney representing Trump. We’ve been through this.
You've never heard me say anything other than that the J6 occupiers were morons. You've never heard me condemn the cop who shot Ashli Babbitt. Trump never told them to do what they did. Another reality you prefer to ignore.
The issue is that they wouldn’t have been there without Trump making up stories.
Which takes us back to the evidence that you've made clear you don't want to hear about that the '20 election was dirty.
Then get hired as Trump’s attorney and prove it. The guys he hired failed to do so.
We have some gun control - like you're not supposed to lie on a 4473 form like Hunter Biden did. An illegal alien convicted felon like the one who killed Kate Steinle with a stolen firearm isn't supposed to be in possession of any firearm, let alone a stole firearm. An illegal isn't supposed to be on American soil in the first place.
Then why does Trump tell Republicans not to pass border measures?
"Women's rights" doesn't give anyone free rein to ignore the Constitution. There's no "but I really want it" clause in the Constitution. Women have the right to petition for a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion rights - which from what I can tell is what you mean by "women's rights".
Trump appointed justices that lied at their confirmation hearings about overturning RvW. The
was never pro life. It’s simply a political football for him. I’ll bet my house he’s paid for abortions. My wife was a couple months pregnant and the baby’s heart stopped beating. In some states today, she would have not been able to get a D&C to remove our dead fetus, which could have lead to serious complications. So for that issue alone, fuck Trump.
Laken (not "Lincoln") Riley, Kate Steinle, Mollie Tibbetts and many, many more women had their rights violated - remind me, have you ever made clear you want much tighter border and immigration control? That what someone brings of value to the US should be the first priority, not "diversity lottery" or phony "asylum" claims? That the US doesn't exist to be the welfare state and dumping ground for the third world?
I am for border control. Changing asylum laws can’t happen by executive order. Republicans are currently the ones stopping progress.
Women shouldn't have to compete against or have their space invaded by dudes in skirts.
You've made it clear your concern with the Constitution is highly conditional.
More hedging, excuse-making despite that you know it's wrong.
I don't condone sexual assault, sure is funny that the one woman to actually go to court - after a tailor-made law that allowed her to do so was enacted - is a leftist loon and has a nonsense story that's full of holes and just by coincidence is trying to sell books. Certainly a financial interest always enhances one's credibility.
You never did answer whether you find her story to be credible, you made some noise about not basing your opinion only on testimony which makes no sense. Her claims outside of her testimony are out there to see. You can find them just like I did just like you can find her discussing "scheming" against Trump with a friend and her disjointed comments about rape.
I think she’s likely credible because I trust our system more than not. We’ve had this issue before. You expect me to speak with authority on something I can’t possibly know. Just like you speak with authority on things you can’t possibly know. My single opinion is irrelevant when we elect judges and juries are selected to decide. Those jurors have declared her credible. I wasn’t present to the trial. Like 2020, you don’t like the outcome so you declare the process faulty. It’s tiresome.
I don’t like what the SC decided so I’m voting against the guy who appointed those justices etc. That’s how it works. I’m not going to storm the capital about it.
It's more demonstration of what a scummy individual he is - that you're happy to ignore. Because "mean tweets", "Orange Man Baaaad!"
Whatever. Your story is boring me now. I was tempted to keep responding to see how long you’d go back and forth. You can’t resist trying to have the last word lol. Go ahead. This is stupid.
